<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Archetyped &#8250; Walk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archetyped.com/tag/walk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archetyped.com</link>
	<description>Explore, Experiment, Inspire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:19:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Reviews &#8250; Stem Primal Origins vs New Balance Minimus Trail (MT20)</title>
		<link>http://archetyped.com/reviews/stem-primal-origins-vs-new-balance-mt20-minimus-trail/</link>
		<comments>http://archetyped.com/reviews/stem-primal-origins-vs-new-balance-mt20-minimus-trail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barefoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photowalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archetyped.com/auto-draft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I go on a nice long walk with the Stem Primal Origins and also compare them to a pair of New Balance Minimus Trail shoes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, I went on a <a href="http://archetyped.com/blog/kapolei/" title="Kapolei">photowalk</a>, and also had the opportunity to put the Stem Primal Origins and the New Balance Minimus Trail (MT20) foot-to-foot, as it were.</p>
<h2>Details</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Distance:</strong> 5.6mi</li>
<li><strong>Time:</strong> 4:34:25</li>
<li><strong>Average Speed:</strong> 1.22mi/hr</li>
<li><strong>Socks:</strong> No</li>
</ul>
<h2>Photowalk</h2>
<p>Speed is not a concern when going on a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photowalking" target="_blank">photowalk</a>, but comfort definitely is since you&#8217;re both moving and standing still quite a bit.</p>
<p>After over 4.5 hours of walking and shooting, I can confirm that my feet were indeed tired.  However, I still felt very light on my feet and the shoes remained comfortable.  Despite not having any socks to minimize friction between the shoe and my feet, I felt no hotspots and developed no blisters while walking with the Stem Primal Origins.</p>
<p>In all, the Stem Primal Origins are great walking shoes.</p>
<h2>New Balance MT20 (Minimus Trail)</h2>
<p>New Balance was one of the first mainstream shoe companies to offer a minimalist shoe for the masses.  The MT20 is New Balance&#8217;s trail running model.  My last <em>normal</em> shoe was a New Balance M871, so I&#8217;ve been keeping an eye on NB&#8217;s progression in the minimalist arena.  I was initially pleased to see that they went with a Vibram sole, but the raised heel of most (if not all) of their minimalist models has kept me away (my knee pain from an old injury finally went away once I started running barefoot, so I&#8217;m not going back to a raised heel shoe).</p>
<h2>The Comparison</h2>
<p>During my walk, I stopped in Sports Authority and tried on a pair of New Balance MT20&#8242;s.  I figured this was the perfect opportunity to compare a shoe from one of the &#8220;big boys&#8221; to the Stem Primal Origins.</p>
<p><a href="http://archetyped.com/wp-content/uploads/stem_primal-origins_2011-10-27_nb-mt20.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-943" title="Stem Primal Origins &amp; New Balance MT20 Compared" src="http://archetyped.com/wp-content/uploads/stem_primal-origins_2011-10-27_nb-mt20-598x398.jpg" alt="" width="598" height="398" /></a></p>
<p>Here is a rundown of my observations:</p>
<ul>
<li>NB MT20 toe box is <strong>much narrower</strong> than the Stem Primal Origins.  I had to go 2 sizes up in the MT20&#8242;s and my toes were still overlapping.  Not comfortable.</li>
<li>NB MT20 sole is quite thin and flexible, but the Stem Primal Origins sole is positively floppy by comparison.  I was surprised at the difference in stiffness of the soles of two minimalist shoes</li>
<li>Ground feel between the two shoes is like night and day!  The NB MT20 is not nearly as sensitive as the Stem Primal Origins.</li>
<li>Styling of the NB MT20 is more to my liking than the Stem Primal Origins.</li>
<li>Fit and finish of the NB MT20 is more refined than the Stem Primal Origins.  There are no highly visible seams on the MT20.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The wider toe box and more flexible sole makes the Stem Primal Origins the more comfortable shoes.  However, I do dig the styling  and refinement of the New Balance MT20 and am curious whether my initial misgivings would remain after a run on the trails with a pair.</p>
<p><a href="http://archetyped.com/reviews/stem-primal-origins-vs-new-balance-mt20-minimus-trail/"> Stem Primal Origins vs New Balance Minimus Trail (MT20)</a> was originally published on <a href="http://archetyped.com">Archetyped</a> on October 27, 2011 05:00pm</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://archetyped.com/reviews/stem-primal-origins-vs-new-balance-mt20-minimus-trail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

